| |
|
| |
|
 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
ARCA has established a series of objectives which guides its
consideration of which research projects to facilitate in
bringing to fruition. Within that context, ARCA has also
established a number of areas of research priority. Here you
will find more detail about the objectives and priorities for
the ARCA research program.
If you have a research project which you believe ARCA could
assist in facilitating a connection with industry and/or government
funding, we would be interested to hear from you.
On this page, you will find further information on some of the
criteria we consider in deciding which projects will receive
support from ARCA, as well as the type of information about the project it
would be useful for you to provide to ARCA to aid in its
decision-making.
Also set out below are some flow charts showing how projects
move through the conceptual to dissemination processes of ARCA,
as well as generally how ARCA manages its role in respect of a
project. |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
ARCA's principal research objective is to facilitate the undertaking and public
dissemination of research on actuarial-related issues which is:
-
of the highest quality;
-
independent; and
- relevant to contemporary
policy and business issues.
|
| |
ARCA's research priorities are intended to reflect contemporary
policy and business issues. As such, they evolve and adapt over
time. At present, its research priorities are in the following
areas:
-
workers compensation;
-
climate
change;
-
population ageing; and
-
health.
Notwithstanding these stated priorities, interested parties are
strongly encouraged to contact ARCA about potential research
topics outside these areas. Generally, research topics that are
more likely to be considered favourably are those
where the application of actuarial, and actuarial-related,
science can make an important and distinct contribution beyond
that already available in the public debate.
As
such, in general, priority will be given to topics that add
value to public policy debate, discussion and development within
the Australian community in areas that are related to the
actuarial profession, in the broadest sense. Below are some more
detailed considerations given by ARCA to potential research
projects. |
| |
| |
|
Project criteria for ARCA interest |
|
|
|
|
Whilst ARCA does not seek to confine too readily potential
projects of interest by reference to a narrow set of criteria,
the following provides interested parties with an indication of what
factors may present a more persuasive argument for ARCA's
involvement. |
| |
|
Ability to capture institutional support for project |
Potential to advance actuarial influence and horizon thinking |
| |
|
|
Easy to identify the likely interested parties |
Of significant public interest |
|
|
|
|
The parties are expected to be able to find the necessary funds |
Strong immediate demand |
|
|
|
|
The project is likely to deliver financial or other benefits to
the interested parties |
Seen as an actuarial issue |
|
|
|
|
The project has a 'public good' flavour |
Opportunity to be repeated |
|
|
|
|
The project is potentially repeatable for others or at a later
time |
Opportunity for results to generate public commentary and
discussion |
|
|
|
|
There is a need for actuarial input |
Strong desire for independence |
|
|
|
|
The parties can assist with conduct of the project (for example, provide
access to data, supply individuals who can contribute to the
research |
Where the outcome would be useful for showcasing the actuarial
profession or to enhance multidisciplinary connections |
| |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
The success of ARCA is very much dependent upon the effective
alignment of all parties involved in each ARCA project. These
guidelines prescribe a standard format to be used to define a
project. Initial versions of a project definition will be
developed by the project architects, and will be refined as
discussions with potential funders and researchers progresses.
The end result will establish the target against which progress
can be measured through the project. |
| |
|
Standard Format for Project Definition |
| |
|
Title |
A short stand-alone title. |
|
|
|
|
Description |
Several sentences that outline the essence of the project. |
|
|
|
|
Background |
This sets the scene that underlines the need for the project. |
|
|
|
|
Scope |
More specific detail about what is included in scope and, more
importantly, what is excluded from the project scope. |
|
|
|
|
Possible outcomes |
Describe the target or what a great result might look like. |
|
|
|
|
Likely sponsors |
Describe the most likely financial supporters of the project and
whether they are likely to supply additional non-monetary
support. |
|
|
|
|
Intended audience |
Which audiences will be interested in the outcomes of the
research? |
|
|
|
|
Use of outcomes |
How will the outcomes of the research be utilised? |
|
|
|
|
Research team |
What skills and experience will be required, and who are the
likely research team members or how will they be identified? |
|
|
|
|
Actuarial advisers |
The names of those who will provide the actuarial oversight, or
the credentials needed and the method of selection. |
|
|
|
|
Project structure |
Outline the project phases, their likely duration and, if
possible, some indication of required budget. |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
|
Click on the graphic below to view an illustration of the
typical flow of a project under ARCA's guidance, from project
concept phase to dissemination phase: |
| |
|
 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Typical
ARCA project management structure |
| |
|
Click on the graphic below to view an illustration of the
typical way in which undertakes project management: |
| |
|
 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|